4.7 Article

Concentrations and health risk assessment of rare earth elements in vegetables from mining area in Shandong, China

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages 578-582

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.023

Keywords

Rare earth elements; Vegetable; Health risk; China

Funding

  1. Medical and Health Technology Project of Shandong Province [2014WS0372, 2015WS0281]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the concentrations of rare earth elements in vegetables and assess human health risk through vegetable consumption, a total of 301 vegetable samples were collected from mining area and control area in Shandong, China. The contents of 14 rare earth elements were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP MS). The total rare earth elements in vegetables from mining and control areas were 94.08 mu kg(-1) and 38.67 mu kg(-1), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The leaf vegetable had the highest rare earth elements concentration (984.24 mu kg(-1) and 81.24 pg kg(-1) for mining and control areas, respectively) and gourd vegetable had the lowest rare earth elements concentration (37.34 mu g kg(-1) and 24.63 mu g kg(-1) for mining and control areas, respectively). For both areas, the rare earth elements concentration in vegetables declined in the order of leaf vegetable > taproot vegetable > alliaceous vegetable > gourd vegetable. The rare earth elements distribution patterns for both areas were characterized by enrichment of light rare earth elements. The health risk assessment demonstrated that the estimated daily intakes (0.69 mu kg(-1) d(-1) and 0.28 mu kg(-1) d(-1) for mining and control areas, respectively) of rare earth elements through vegetable consumption were significantly lower than the acceptable daily intake (70 mu kg(-1) d(-1)). The damage to adults can be neglected, but more attention should be paid to the effects of continuous exposure to low levels of rare earth elements on children. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available