4.8 Article

The thermal mismatch hypothesis explains host susceptibility to an emerging infectious disease

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 184-193

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12720

Keywords

Amphibian declines; amphibians; Atelopus zeteki; Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis; chytrid fungus; climate change; disease; disease ecology; host-parasite interactions; thermal biology

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EF-1241889, DEB-1518681]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01GM109499, R01TW010286-01]
  3. US Department of Agriculture [2009-35102-0543]
  4. US Environmental Protection Agency [83518801]
  5. University of Tampa (Faculty Development Dana Grant)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Parasites typically have broader thermal limits than hosts, so large performance gaps between pathogens and their cold-and warm-adapted hosts should occur at relatively warm and cold temperatures, respectively. We tested this thermal mismatch hypothesis by quantifying the temperature-dependent susceptibility of cold-and warm-adapted amphibian species to the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) using laboratory experiments and field prevalence estimates from 15 410 individuals in 598 populations. In both the laboratory and field, we found that the greatest susceptibility of cold-and warm-adapted hosts occurred at relatively warm and cool temperatures, respectively, providing support for the thermal mismatch hypothesis. Our results suggest that as climate change shifts hosts away from their optimal temperatures, the probability of increased host susceptibility to infectious disease might increase, but the effect will depend on the host species and the direction of the climate shift. Our findings help explain the tremendous variation in species responses to Bd across climates and spatial, temporal and species-level variation in disease outbreaks associated with extreme weather events that are becoming more common with climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available