4.4 Article

GPs' perceptions of workload in England: a qualitative interview study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Volume 67, Issue 655, Pages E138-E147

Publisher

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X688849

Keywords

general practice; general practitioners; patient expectations; patients' needs; primary health care; qualitative research; workload

Funding

  1. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences
  2. NIHR SPCR
  3. NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Oxford
  4. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)
  5. National Institute for Health Research [DRF-2014-07-052, IS-SPC-0514-10043, NF-SI-0611-10273] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [IS-SPC-0514-10043, DRF-2014-07-052] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background GPs report the lowest levels of morale among doctors, job satisfaction is low, and the GP workforce is diminishing. Workload is frequently cited as negatively impacting on commitment to a career in general practice, and many GPs report that their workload is unmanageable. Aim To gather an in-depth understanding of GPs' perceptions and attitudes towards workload. Design and setting All GPs working within NHS England were eligible. Advertisements were circulated via regional GP e-mail lists and national social media networks in June 2015. Of those GPs who responded, a maximum-variation sample was selected until data saturation was reached. Method Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted. Data were analysed thematically. Results In total, 171 GPs responded, and 34 were included in this study. GPs described an increase in workload over recent years, with current working days being long and intense, raising concerns over the wellbeing of GPs and patients. Full-time partnership was generally not considered to be possible, and many participants felt workload was unsustainable, particularly given the diminishing workforce. Four major themes emerged to explain increased workload: increased patient needs and expectations; a changing relationship between primary and secondary care; bureaucracy and resources; and the balance of workload within a practice. Continuity of care was perceived as being eroded by changes in contracts and working patterns to deal with workload. Conclusion This study highlights the urgent need to address perceived lack of investment and clinical capacity in general practice, and suggests that managing patient expectations around what primary care can deliver, and reducing bureaucracy, have become key issues, at least until capacity issues are resolved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available