4.4 Article

Pulmonary Hypertension

Journal

DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages 73-83

Publisher

DEUTSCHER AERZTE-VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0073

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Actelion
  2. Bayer
  3. Gilead
  4. GSK
  5. MSD
  6. Pfizer
  7. Novartis
  8. United Therapeutics
  9. OMT
  10. Bellerophon
  11. Boehringer
  12. Menarini

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: About 1% of adults suffer from pulmonary hypertension (PH). The various types of PH differ widely with respect to their incidence, clinical significance, and treatment. Methods: Selective review of the literature in association with a consensus conference. Results: Pulmonary hypertension is divided into five major categories. Those that are of particular clinical relevance are pulmonary arterial hypertension, chronic thrombo embolic pulmonary hypertension, and pulmonary hypertension due to left heart and lung diseases. Ten drugs from five different substance classes are now available for the treatment of PH and are often given in combination. The treatment strategy is determined by risk stratification based on the severity of disease, along with the clinical phenotype and possible accompanying illnesses. The preferred treatment for chronic thromboembolic pulmo nary hypertension is surgical pulmonary endarterectomy; inoperable patients are treated with drugs and endovas cular interventions. PH due to left heart and lung diseases generally calls for specific treatment of pulmonary hypertension only if there is severe right-heart strain. Conclusion: The diagnosis and treatment of severe forms of PH, in particular, pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, are complex and are best carried out in close cooperation between the local physician and specialized centers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available