4.7 Article

Chemical thermodynamics analysis for in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion of lignite with phosphogypsum for syngas

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages 516-522

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.106

Keywords

Syngas; Phosphogypsum; In-situ gasification chemical looping; combustion (IG-CLC); Thermodynamics analysis; Lower heating value (LHV); Cold gas efficiency

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Plan (863 of China) [2011AA06A106]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21666016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosphogypsum (PG) is a by-product of wet phosphoric acid, whereas low rank coal-lignite has high moisture and high-sulfur which seriously influence its direct use. As a promising raw material for chemical industry, syngas can be obtained through a properly designed in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion process (IG-CLC). This concept was demonstrated using a thermodynamic software Factsage, by employing PG as oxygen carrier and lignite as fuel under different conditions. The experiments were conducted in laboratory to confirm the theoretical calculations. The results showed that the product of syngas mainly came from solid-solid reaction and gas-solid reaction. Meanwhile, the optimal conditions for syngas production were found to be: the PG/lignite ratio of about 1; reaction temperatures of over 850 degrees C. In addition, water vapor and carbon dioxide were found to have promotive effect on the syngas output. For PG/lignite ratio of 1 and at 850 degrees C, the values for lower heating value (LHV) and cold gas efficiency were higher than 55000.00 kJ/Nm(3) and 63.00%, respectively. Compared with lignite combustion at 900 degrees C, the production of CO and hydrogen was significantly high. Moreover, the results showed that PG is a promising oxygen carrier for syngas production by IG-CLC process. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available