4.8 Article

Proteomics Analysis of O-GaINAc Glycosylation in Human Serum by an Integrated Strategy

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages 1469-1476

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02887

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. China State Key Basic Research Program [2016YFA0501402, 2013CB911202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21535008, 21405156, 81430072, 81361128]
  3. National Science Fund of China for Distinguished Young Scholars [21525524]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The diversity of O-linked glycan structures has drawn increasing attention due to its vital biological roles. However, intact O-glycopeptides with different glycans are typically not well elucidated using the current methods. In this work, an integrated strategy was developed for comprehensive analysis of O-GalNAc glycosylation by combining hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) tip enrichment, beam-type collision induced decomposition (beam-CID) detection, and in silico deglycosylation method for spectra interpretation. In this strategy, the intact O-GalNAc glycopeptides were selectively enriched and the original spectra obtained by time-of-flight (TOF)-CID were preprocessed using an in silico deglycosylation method, enabling direct searching without setting multiple glycosylation modifications, which could significantly decrease the search space. This strategy was applied to analyze the O-GalNAc glycoproteome of human serum, leading to identification of 407 intact O-GalNAc glycopeptides from 93 glycoproteins. About 81% of the glycopeptides contained at least one sialic acid, which could reveal the microheterogeneity of O-GalNAc glycosylation. Up until now, this is the largest data set of intact O-GalNAc glycoforms from complex biological samples at the proteome level. Furthermore, this method is readily applicable to study O-glycoform heterogeneity in other complex biological systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available