4.7 Article

Gravitational waves at aLIGO and vacuum stability with a scalar singlet extension of the standard model

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 95, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.043505

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council Grant [ST/J000418/1]
  3. STFC [ST/J000418/1, ST/L000520/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000520/1, ST/J000418/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new gauge singlet scalar field can undergo a strongly first-order phase transition (PT) leading to gravitational waves (GW) potentially observable at aLIGO and stabilizes the electroweak vacuum at the same time by ensuring that the Higgs quartic coupling remains positive up to at least the grand unification (GUT) scale. aLIGO (O5) is potentially sensitive to cosmological PTs at 10(7)-10(8) GeV, which coincides with the requirement that the singlet scale is less than the standard model (SM) vacuum instability scale, which is between 10(8) GeV and 10(14) GeV. After sampling its parameter space, we identify three benchmark points with a PT at about T approximate to 10(7) GeV in a gauge singlet extension of the SM. We calculate the nucleation temperature, order parameter, characteristic time scale, and peak amplitude and frequency of GW from bubble collisions during the PT for the benchmarks and find that, in an optimistic scenario, GW from such a PT may be in reach of aLIGO (O5). We confirm that the singlet stabilizes the electroweak vacuum while remaining consistent with zero-temperature phenomenology as well. Thus, this scenario presents an intriguing possibility that aLIGO may detect traces of fundamental physics motivated by vacuum stability at an energy scale that is well above the reach of any other experiment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available