4.7 Article

In situ gasification Chemical-Looping Combustion of coal using limestone as oxygen carrier precursor and sulphur sorbent

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 310, Issue -, Pages 226-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.113

Keywords

CO2 capture; Chemical Looping Combustion; Coal; Desulphurization; Calcium-based sorbent; Oxygen carrier

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [ENE 2014-56857-R, ENE2013-45454-R]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  3. CSIC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In-situ Gasification Chemical-Looping Combustion (iG-CLC) burning coal is achieving a great interest due to the possibility of using low cost oxygen carriers such as CaSO4. The Limestone Chemical Looping Combustion process (LCL-C (TM)) registered by Alstom Power Inc. proposes the use of a continuous CaCO3 feeding together with coal to produce CaSO4 as an oxygen carrier via sulphur retention. The operation is similar to what happens in a circulating fluidized bed boiler burning coal. In the present research work, the study of thermodynamic equilibrium limitations together with mass and enthalpy balances have been carried out for a CLC system in order to investigate whether the LCL-C (TM) process is a promising and energy efficient option to carry out the coal combustion with CO2 capture and in-situ desulphurisation. So, no limitations were found to transfer the required oxygen from air to fuel using sulphated limestone as oxygen carrier for whatever coal used. The selection of a suitable oxygen carrier to fuel ratio mainly depends on the sulphur content of the coal used. In addition, no drawback referred to thermal integration in the system has been detected. Thus, operation at 950 degrees C in the fuel reactor to avoid SO2 release via side reactions, and 1050 degrees C in the air reactor is feasible. Likewise, experimental tests have been performed in a thermogravimetric analyser to evaluate the capability of a limestone to be sulphated and to transfer oxygen. A value of the oxygen transport capacity of about 16.7 wt.% was obtained. This value is four times higher than that of others typical inexpensive oxygen carriers published in literature. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available