4.7 Review

Sampling Strategies for Three-Dimensional Spatial Community Structures in IBD Microbiota Research

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00051

Keywords

sampling strategies; community structure; IBD microbiota research; feces; colonoscopic biopsy; mucus gel layer; oral cavity

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA020701]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31470967]
  3. China Alliance of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Wu Jie Ping Medical Foundation [2017001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identifying intestinal microbiota is arguably an important task that is performed to determine the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD); thus, it is crucial to collect and analyze intestinally-associated microbiota. Analyzing a single niche to categorize individuals does not enable researchers to comprehensively study the spatial variations of the microbiota. Therefore, characterizing the spatial community structures of the inflammatory bowel disease microbiome is critical for advancing our understanding of the inflammatory landscape of IBD. However, at present there is no universally accepted consensus regarding the use of specific sampling strategies in different biogeographic locations. In this review, we discuss the spatial distribution when screening sample collections in IBD microbiota research. Here, we propose a novel model, a three-dimensional spatial community structure, which encompasses the x-, y-, and z-axis distributions; it can be used in some sampling sites, such as feces, colonoscopic biopsy, the mucus gel layer, and oral cavity. On the basis of this spatial model, this article also summarizes various sampling and processing strategies prior to and after DNA extraction and recommends guidelines for practical application in future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available