4.6 Article

Population persistence in flowing-water habitats: Conditions where flow-based management of harmful algal blooms works, and where it does not

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 172-181

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.044

Keywords

Prymnesium parvum; Harmful algal bloom; Reservoirs; Hydraulic storage zone; Hydraulic flushing; Advection-diffusion model

Funding

  1. US Army Corps of Engineers, Aquatic Plant Control Research Program [W912HZ-11-C-0063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Control of harmful algae in the coves or bays of larger water bodies could be accomplished by hydraulic flushing with algae-free water. This suggestion is examined with a mathematical model of a harmful algal population, parameterized to represent the toxic haptophyte Prymnesium parvum, and its limiting nutrient. A small cove with a hydraulic storage zone and longitudinal advection and dispersion is coupled to a larger lake where ongoing or transient blooms serve as a source for the algal population. This population is transported upstream by dispersion and flushed downstream by advection. Morphometry and hydraulics represent a lake in Texas where blooms of P. parvum have been problematic. When dispersion and hydraulic storage are low to moderate, available pumping technology is predicted to be capable of suppressing the algal population within a variable portion of the cove, under both steady state and transient conditions. This suppression occurs when temperature-dependent algal growth is low. At temperatures high enough to support more rapid growth, flow augmentation carries a risk of stimulating a bloom under some hydraulic conditions. The model presented here complements similar models without population sources, and contributes to theoretical understanding of population persistence in reservoirs and other flowing-water habitats. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available