Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Evidence that Viewers Prefer Higher Frame-Rate Film
Laurie M. Wilcox et al.
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED PERCEPTION (2015)
Humans perceive flicker artifacts at 500 Hz
James Davis et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2015)
Walking without optic flow reduces subsequent vection
Takeharu Seno et al.
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH (2015)
Vection is modulated by the semantic meaning of stimuli and experimental instructions
Masaki Ogawa et al.
PERCEPTION (2014)
Wearing Heavy Iron Clogs Can Inhibit Vection
Takeharu Seno et al.
MULTISENSORY RESEARCH (2013)
Stereoscopy and the Human Visual System
Martin S. Banks et al.
SMPTE MOTION IMAGING JOURNAL (2012)
Additional oscillation can facilitate visually induced self-motion perception: The effects of its coherence and amplitude gradient
Shinji Nakamura
PERCEPTION (2010)
Vection Aftereffects from Expanding/Contracting Stimuli
Takeharu Seno et al.
SEEING AND PERCEIVING (2010)
Effect of motion smoothness on brain activity while observing a dance: An fMRI study using a humanoid robot
Naoki Miura et al.
SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE (2010)
Static visual components without depth modulation alter the strength of vection
Takeharu Seno et al.
VISION RESEARCH (2010)
Effect of motion smoothness on the flash-lag illusion
Jacques K. Rizk et al.
VISION RESEARCH (2009)
Self-motion perception from expanding and contracting optical flows overlapped with binocular disparity
H Ito et al.
VISION RESEARCH (2005)
Jitter and size effects on vection are immune to experimental instructions and demands
S Palmisano et al.
PERCEPTION (2004)
Temporal integration of optic flow, measured by contrast and coherence thresholds
DC Burr et al.
VISION RESEARCH (2001)
Mental imagery of visual motion modifies the perception of roll-vection stimulation
FW Mast et al.
PERCEPTION (2001)