4.8 Article

The Neolithic Transition in the Baltic Was Not Driven by Admixture with Early European Farmers

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 576-582

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.060

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant [ERC-2010-StG 263441]
  2. Irish Research Council Advanced Research Project Grant
  3. ERC [295729-CodeX, 647787-LocalAdaptation]
  4. FP7MC Career Integration Grant (NEMO-ADAP) [322261]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Neolithic transition was a dynamic time in European prehistory of cultural, social, and technological change. Although this period has been well explored in central Europe using ancient nuclear DNA [1, 2], its genetic impact on northern and eastern parts of this continent has not been as extensively studied. To broaden our understanding of the Neolithic transition across Europe, we analyzed eight ancient genomes: six samples (four to similar to 1- to 4-fold coverage) from a 3,500 year temporal transect (similar to 8,300-4,800 calibrated years before present) through the Baltic region dating from the Mesolithic to the Late Neolithic and two samples spanning the Mesolithic-Neolithic boundary from the Dnieper Rapids region of Ukraine. We find evidence that some hunter-gatherer ancestry persisted across the Neolithic transition in both regions. However, we also find signals consistent with influxes of non-local people, most likely from northern Eurasia and the Pontic Steppe. During the Late Neolithic, this Steppe related impact coincides with the proposed emergence of Indo-European languages in the Baltic region [3, 4]. These influences are distinct from the early farmer admixture that transformed the genetic landscape of central Europe, suggesting that changes associated with the Neolithic package in the Baltic were not driven by the same Anatolian sourced genetic exchange.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available