4.7 Article

Characterization and optimization of low cost microfluidic thread based electroanalytical device for micro flow injection analysis

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 951, Issue -, Pages 108-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.11.046

Keywords

Micro flow injection analysis; Microfluidic thread-based electroanalytical device; Passive pumps; Cotton thread

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The micro flow injection analysis (FIA) is a powerful technique that uses the principles of traditional flow analysis in a microfluidic device and brings a number of improvements related to the consumption of reagents and samples, speed of analysis and portability. However, the complexity and cost of manufacturing processes, difficulty in integrating micropumps and the limited performance of systems employing passive pumps are challenges that must be overcome. Here, we present the characterization and optimization of a low cost device based on cotton threads as microfluidic channel to perform mu FIA based on passive pumps with good analytical performance in a simple, easy and inexpensive way. The transport of solutions is made through cotton threads by capillary force facilitated by gravity. After studying and optimizing several features related to the device, were obtained a flow rate of 2.2 +/- 0.1 mu L s(-1), an analytical frequency of 208 injections per hour, a sample injection volume of 2.0 mu L and a waste volume of approximately 40 mu L per analysis. For chronoamperometric determination of naproxen, a detection limit of 0.29 mu mol L-1 was reached, with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 1.69% between injections and a RSD of 3.79% with five different devices. Thus, based on the performance presented by proposed microfluidic device, it is possible to overcome some limitations of the FIA systems based on passive pumps and allow expansion in the use of this technique. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available