4.7 Article

Neoproterozoic paleogeography of the Tarim Block: An extended or alternative missing-link model for Rodinia?

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 458, Issue -, Pages 92-106

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.10.030

Keywords

Tarim Block; paleomagnetism; Neoproterozoic; missing-link; Rodinia; supercontinent

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41274071, 41230208]
  2. Yale University
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  4. Nanjing University [201501B027]
  5. Institute for Rock Magnetism, University of Minnesota
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1339505] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent reconstructions of the Rodinia supercontinent and its breakup incorporate South China as a missing link between Australia and Laurentia, and place the Tarim craton adjacent to northwestern Australia on the supercontinent's periphery. However, subsequent kinematic evolution toward Gondwana amalgamation requires complex geometric shuffling between South China and Tarim, which cannot be easily resolved with the stratigraphic records of those blocks. Here we present new paleomagnetic data from early Ediacaran strata of northwest Tarim, and document large-scale rotation at near constant paleolatitudes during Cryogenian time. The rotation is coeval with Rodinia breakup, and Tarim's paleolatitudes are compatible with its placement between Australia and Laurentia, either by itself as an alternative missing link or joined with South China in that role. At the same time, indications of subduction-related magmatism in Tarim's Neoproterozoic record suggest that Rodinia breakup was dynamically linked to subduction retreat along its northern margin. Such a model is akin to early stages of Jurassic fragmentation within southern Gondwana, and implies more complicated subduction-related dynamics of supercontinent breakup than superplume impingement alone. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available