4.8 Article

Genome-wide identification of lineage and locus specific variation associated with pneumococcal carriage duration

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.26255

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [098051, 104169/Z/14/Z, 083735/Z/07/Z]
  2. Medical Research Council [1365620]
  3. Royal Society [104169/Z/14/Z]
  4. MRC [MR/R003076/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/K010174/1B, MR/R003076/1, 1365620] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10066, NF-SI-0515-10065] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Wellcome Trust [104169/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a leading cause of invasive disease in infants, especially in low-income settings. Asymptomatic carriage in the nasopharynx is a prerequisite for disease, but variability in its duration is currently only understood at the serotype level. Here we developed a model to calculate the duration of carriage episodes from longitudinal swab data, and combined these results with whole genome sequence data. We estimated that pneumococcal genomic variation accounted for 63% of the phenotype variation, whereas the host traits considered here (age and previous carriage) accounted for less than 5%. We further partitioned this heritability into both lineage and locus effects, and quantified the amount attributable to the largest sources of variation in carriage duration: serotype (17%), drug-resistance (9%) and other significant locus effects (7%). A pan-genome-wide association study identified prophage sequences as being associated with decreased carriage duration independent of serotype, potentially by disruption of the competence mechanism. These findings support theoretical models of pneumococcal competition and antibiotic resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available