4.8 Article

Substrate specificity of TOR complex 2 is determined by a ubiquitin-fold domain of the Sin1 subunit

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.19594

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM059788]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23870019, 26291024, 16K14681, 26291013, 23770230, 25440086]
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture,Sports, Science, and Technology
  4. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  5. Mitsubishi Foundation
  6. Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science
  7. Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
  8. Sagawa Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research
  9. Foundation for NAIST
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23870019, 25440086, 16K14681, 26291013, 26291024, 23770230] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The target of rapamycin (TOR) protein kinase forms multi-subunit TOR complex 1 (TORC1) and TOR complex 2 (TORC2), which exhibit distinct substrate specificities. Sin1 is one of the TORC2-specific subunit essential for phosphorylation and activation of certain AGC-family kinases. Here, we show that Sin1 is dispensable for the catalytic activity of TORC2, but its conserved region in the middle (Sin1CRIM) forms a discrete domain that specifically binds the TORC2 substrate kinases. Sin1CRIM fused to a different TORC2 subunit can recruit the TORC2 substrate Gad8 for phosphorylation even in the sin1 null mutant of fission yeast. The solution structure of Sin1CRIM shows a ubiquitin-like fold with a characteristic acidic loop, which is essential for interaction with the TORC2 substrates. The specific substrate-recognition function is conserved in human Sin1CRIM, which may represent a potential target for novel anticancer drugs that prevent activation of the mTORC2 substrates such as AKT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available