4.7 Article

Experimental study of oscillating-grid turbulence interacting with a solid boundary

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 813, Issue -, Pages 768-798

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.843

Keywords

homogeneous turbulence; turbulent boundary layers; turbulent flows

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Studentship [1510466]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1510466] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction between scillating-grid turbulence and a solid, impermeable boundary (positioned below, and aligned parallel to, the grid) is studied experimentally. Instantaneous velocity measurements, obtained using two-dimensional particle imaging velocimetry in the vertical plane through the centre of the (horizontal) grid, are used to study the effect of the boundary on the root-mean-square velocity components, the vertical flux of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and the terms in the Reynolds stress transport equation. Identified as a critical aspect of the interaction is the blocking of a vertical flux of TKE across the boundary-affected region. Terms of the Reynolds stress transport equations show that the blocking of this energy flux acts to increase the boundary-tangential turbulent velocity component, relative to the far-field trend, but not the boundary-normal velocity component. The results are compared with previous studies of the interaction between zero-mean-shear turbulence and a solid boundary. In particular, the data reported here are in support of viscous and 'return-to-isotropy' mechanisms governing the intercomponent energy transfer previously proposed, respectively, by Perot & Moin (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 295, 1995, pp. 199-227) and Walker et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 320, 1996, pp. 19-51), although we note that these mechanisms are not independent of the blocking of energy flux and draw parallels to the related model proposed by Magnaudet (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 484, 2003, pp. 167-196).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available