4.7 Article

Cross -stream stereoscopic particle image velocimetry of a modified turbulent boundary layer over directional surface pattern

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 813, Issue -, Pages 412-435

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.879

Keywords

boundary layer structure; turbulence control; turbulent boundary layers

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-10-1-0372, FA955014-1-0101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A turbulent boundary layer developed over a herringbone patterned riblet surface is investigated using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry in the cross-stream plane at Re, 3900. The three velocity components resulting from this experiment reveal a pronounced spanwise periodicity in all single-point velocity statistics. Consistent with previous hot-wire studies over similar-type riblets, we observe a weak time-average secondary flow in the form of (delta-filling streamwise vortices. The observed differences in the surface and secondary flow characteristics, compared to other heterogeneous-roughness studies, may suggest that different mechanisms are responsible for the flow modifications in this case. Observations of instantaneous velocity fields reveal modified and rearranged turbulence structures. The instantaneous snapshots also suggest that the time-average secondary flow may be an artefact arising from superpositions of much stronger instantaneous turbulent events enhanced by the surface texture. In addition, the observed instantaneous secondary motions seem to have promoted a free-stream-engulfing behaviour in the outer layer, which would indicate an increase turbulent/non-turbulent flow mixing. It is overall demonstrated that the presence of large-scale directionality in transitional surface roughness can cause a modification throughout the entire boundary layer, even when the roughness height is 0.5 % of the layer thickness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available