4.2 Article

Distribution, morphology and ecological niche of Batrachospermum and Sheathia species (Batrachospermales, Rhodophyta) in the fontanili of the Po plain (northern Italy)

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 318-329

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09670262.2015.1055592

Keywords

Autecology; freshwater red algae; Italy; lowland springs; molecular data; morphology; physical and chemical determinants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Twenty-three freshwater springs of the Po plain (northern Italy) were surveyed and visited multiple times during 2011-2013 to assess water quality and algal taxa present. Despite poor water conditions of this human-altered floodplain, a relatively high number of taxa referable to the freshwater red algae, Batrachospermum and Sheathia, were observed. The identity of specimens collected was based on morphology and confirmed with sequence data. The specimens belonged to Sheathia arcuata, S. boryana, Batrachospermum atrum, B. gelatinosum and B. gelatinosum f. spermatoinvolucrum. This is the first report of B. gelatinosum f. spermatoinvolucrum outside North America. Niche analysis revealed a marked difference in the physical and chemical preferences of the freshwater red algae recorded. The occurrence of S. boryana was limited to relatively low nitrate and higher oxygen concentrations. Conversely, the spatial distribution of the other four taxa indicated that they were able to tolerate high concentrations of nitrate (up to 53.6 mg l(-1)) and low rates of dissolved oxygen saturation (as low as 3%). All the specimens of B. gelatinosum collected had few to many trichogynes deformed by a basal protuberance or knob, a structure previously unobserved in this species. No other taxa showed any deformities. The ecological analyses confirmed the existence of a relationship between the environmental conditions of the springs and the occurrence of knobs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available