4.2 Article

Switching Between Reference Biologics and Biosimilars for the Treatment of Rheumatology, Gastroenterology, and Dermatology Inflammatory Conditions: Considerations for the Clinician

Journal

CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11926-017-0658-4

Keywords

Biologics; Biosimilars; Switching; Clinical trials; Real world data

Categories

Funding

  1. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of Review Biosimilars of the reference biologic therapeutics infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and rituximab are entering the market. Clinical and real-world data on the effects of reference -> biosimilar switching are limited. This review was carried out to assess the current body of switching data. Recent Findings Fifty-three switching studies were identified. Infliximab publications covered CT-P13 (25 studies), SB2 (1), infliximab NK (1), and unspecified infliximab biosimilars (2). Etanercept publications covered SB4 (2) and GP2015 (2). Adalimumab publications covered ABP 501 (2) and SB5 (1). Rituximab publications covered CT-P10 (1). Efficacy and safety data generally showed no differences between patients who switched treatments versus those who did not. No differences were seen pre- and post-switch. Immunogenicity data were presented in 19/37 (51%) studies. Summary Additional data from switching studies of these therapies are still required, as is continuing pharmacovigilance. Switching should remain a case-by-case clinical decision made by the physician and patient on an individual basis supported by scientific evidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available