4.6 Article

Cortical Thickness Abnormalities in Autism Spectrum Disorders Through Late Childhood, Adolescence, and Adulthood: A Large-Scale MRI Study

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 1721-1731

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx038

Keywords

autism spectrum disorders; cortical development; cortical thickness; delayed maturation; symptom severity

Categories

Funding

  1. Azrieli Neurodevelopmental Research Program
  2. Brain Canada Mutli-Investigator Research Initiative (MIRI) grant
  3. FRSQ
  4. Jeanne-Timmins Costello MNI Fellowship
  5. Calcul Quebec
  6. Compute Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroimaging studies in autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) have provided inconsistent evidence of cortical abnormality. This is probably due to the small sample sizes used in most studies, and important differences in sample characteristics, particularly age, as well as to the heterogeneity of the disorder. To address these issues, we assessed abnormalities in ASD within the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange data set, which comprises data from approximately 1100 individuals (similar to 6-55 years). A subset of these data that met stringent quality control and inclusion criteria (560 male subjects; 266 ASD; age = 6-35 years) were used to compute age-specific differences in cortical thickness in ASD and the relationship of any such differences to symptom severity of ASD. Our results show widespread increased cortical thickness in ASD, primarily left lateralized, from 6 years onwards, with differences diminishing during adulthood. The severity of symptoms related to social affect and communication correlated with these cortical abnormalities. These results are consistent with the conjecture that developmental patterns of cortical thickness abnormalities reflect delayed cortical maturation and highlight the dynamic nature of morphological abnormalities in ASD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available