4.7 Article

The technology and economic determinants of cryptocurrency exchange rates: The case of Bitcoin

Journal

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Volume 95, Issue -, Pages 49-60

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2016.12.001

Keywords

Cryptocurrency; Bitcoin; Exchange rate; Technology-economic perspective; Mining technology

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [CityU 11503115, 11504815]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71572169, 71501168]
  3. Guang Dong Natural Science Foundation [2015A030313876]
  4. City University of Hong Kong Shen Zhen Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, have ignited intense discussions. Despite receiving extensive public attention, theoretical understanding is limited regarding the value of blockchain-based cryptocurrendes, as expressed in their exchange rates against traditional currencies. In this paper, we conduct a theory-driven empirical study of the Bitcoin exchange rate (against USD) determination, taking into consideration both technology and economic factors. To address co-integration in a mix of stationary and non-stationary time series, we use the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model with a bounds test approach in the estimation. Meanwhile, to detect potential structural changes, we estimate our empirical model on two periods separated by the closure of Mt. Gox (one of the largest Bitcoin exchange markets). According to our analysis, in the short term, the Bitcoin exchange rate adjusts to changes in economic fundamentals and market conditions. The long-term Bitcoin exchange rate is more sensitive to economic fundamentals and less sensitive to technological factors after Mt. Gox closed. We also identify a significant impact of mining technology and a decreasing significance of mining difficulty in the Bitcoin exchange price determination.(C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available