4.7 Review

Why are second-generation H1-antihistamines minimally sedating?

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 765, Issue -, Pages 100-106

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.08.016

Keywords

H-1-antihistamine; P-glycoprotein; MDR1; Sedative effect; Minimally sedating

Ask authors/readers for more resources

H-1-antihistamines are widely used in treating allergic disorders, e.g., conjunctivitis, urticaria, dermatitis and asthma. The first-generation H-1-antihistamines have a much greater sedative effect than the second-generation H-1-antihistamines. Researchers could not offer a satisfactory explanations until late 1990s when studies showed that second-generation H-1-antihistamines were substrates of P-glycoprotein. P-glycoprotein, expressed in the blood-brain barrier, acts as an efflux pump to decrease the concentration of H-1-antihistamines in the brain, which minimizes drug effects on the central nervous system and results in less sedation. P-glycoprotein is found in the apical side of the epithelium. It consists of transmembrane domains that bind substrates/drugs and nucleotide-binding domains that bind and hydrolyze ATP to generate energy for the drug efflux. This review mainly discusses interactions between P-glycoprotein and commonly used second-generation H-1-antihistamines. In addition, it describes other possible determining factors of minimal sedating properties of second-generation H-1-antihistamines. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available