4.7 Article

Performance, acute health symptoms and physiological responses during exposure to high air temperature and carbon dioxide concentration

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages 96-105

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.020

Keywords

Temperature; Carbon dioxide; Physiological responses; Acute health symptoms; Work performance

Funding

  1. Bjarne Saxhof's Foundation in Denmark
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478471]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human subjects were exposed for 3 h in a climate chamber to the air temperature of 35 degrees C that is an action level, at which the working time needs to be diminished in China. The purpose was to put this action level to test by measuring physiological responses, subjective ratings and cognitive performance, and compare them with responses at temperature of 26 degrees C (reference exposure). Moreover, CO2 was increased to 3000 ppm (CO2 exposure) at 35 degrees C to further examine, whether this change will have any effect on the measured responses. Compared with the reference exposure, exposure to 35 degrees C caused subjects to report feeling uncomfortably warm, to rate the air quality as worse, to report increased sleepiness and higher intensity of several acute health symptoms. Eardrum temperature, skin temperature, heart rate and body weight loss all increased significantly at this exposure, arterial oxygen saturation decreased significantly, while the percentage-of adjacent inter-beat cardiac intervals differing by > 50 m (pNN50) decreased significantly, indicating elevated stress. The performance of addition and subtraction tasks decreased significantly during this exposure, as well. Increasing CO2 to 3000 ppm at 35 degrees C caused no significant changes in responses. Present results reaffirm the selection of 35 degrees C as an action level, and show that concurrently occurring high CO2 levels should not exacerbate the hazards. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available