4.7 Article

Implementation of subjective cognitive decline criteria in research studies

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 296-311

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.012

Keywords

Subjective cognitive decline (SDC); Alzheimer's disease; SCD-I; Preclinical; Operationalization; Harmonization

Funding

  1. EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND)
  2. National Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII) [AC14/00014]
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  4. la Caixa Foundation
  5. LMUexcellent Initiative
  6. European Commission (ERC) [PCIG12-GA-2012-334259]
  7. Alzheimer's Forschung Initiative (AFI) [DE-15035]
  8. AXA Research Fund
  9. Fondation Universite Pierre et Marie Curie
  10. Fondation pour la Recherche sur Alzheimer, Paris, France
  11. program Investissements d'avenir [ANR-10-IAIHU-06]
  12. US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) [AG03051, AG08051]
  13. National Institute on Aging of the US National Institutes of Health
  14. Fisher Center for Alzheimer's Research Foundation
  15. Hagedorn Fund
  16. Stringer Foundation
  17. Louis J. Kay and June E. Kay Foundation
  18. US National Institute on Aging-National Institutes of Health [K23AG038479]
  19. Stichting Alzheimer Nederland
  20. Stichting VUmc fonds
  21. Gieskes-Strijbis fonds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) manifesting before clinical impairment could serve as a target population for early intervention trials in Alzheimer's disease (AD). A working group, the Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD-I), published SCD research criteria in the context of preclinical AD. To successfully apply them, a number of issues regarding assessment and implementation of SCD needed to be addressed. Methods: Members of the SCD-I met to identify and agree on topics relevant to SCD criteria operationalization in research settings. Initial ideas and recommendations were discussed with other SCD-I working group members and modified accordingly. Results: Topics included SCD inclusion and exclusion criteria, together with the informant's role in defining SCD presence and the impact of demographic factors. Discussion: Recommendations for the operationalization of SCD in differing research settings, with the aim of harmonization of SCD measurement across studies are propcised, to enhance comparability and generalizability across studies. (C) 2016 the Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available