4.3 Article

Validity and reliability of strain gauge measurement of volitional quadriceps force in patients with COPD

Journal

CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 289-297

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1479972316687210

Keywords

Isometric force measurement; muscle testing; rehabilitation; assessment; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Funding

  1. Flemish Research Foundation (FWO) [G.0871.13]
  2. IMI-JU
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil [249579/2013-8, 202425/2011-8]
  4. European Respiratory Society [LTRF 2014 - 3132]
  5. ERS/SEPAR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the validity and reliability of fixed strain gauge measurements of isometric quadriceps force in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A total cohort of 138 patients with COPD were assessed. To determine validity, maximal volitional quadriceps force was evaluated during isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) manoeuvre via a fixed strain gauge dynamometer and compared to (a) potentiated non-volitional quadriceps force obtained via magnetic stimulation of the femoral nerve (twitch (Tw); n = 92) and (b) volitional computerized dynamometry (Biodex; n = 46) and analysed via correlation coefficients. Test-retest and absolute reliability were determined via calculations of intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), smallest real differences (SRDs) and standard errors of measurement (SEMs). For this, MVC recordings in each device were performed across two test sessions separated by a period of 7 days (n = 46). Strain gauge measures of MVC demonstrated very large correlation with Tw and Biodex results (r = 0.86 and 0.88, respectively, both p < 0.0001). ICC, SEM and SRD were numerically comparable between strain gauge and Biodex devices (ICC = 0.96 vs. 0.93; SEM = 8.50 vs. 10.54 Nm and SRD = 23.59 vs. 29.22 Nm, respectively). The results support that strain gauge measures of quadriceps force are valid and reliable in patients with COPD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available