4.7 Article

Locus coeruleus volume and cell population changes during Alzheimer's disease progression: A stereological study in human postmortem brains with potential implication for early-stage biomarker discovery

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 236-246

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.2362

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Brainstem; Locus coeruleus; Human; Neurofibrillary tangles; Unbiased stereology; Postmortem; Neuron counts; Volumetry

Funding

  1. NIH [R01AG040311, P50AG023501, P01AG019724, LIM-22/FMUSP]
  2. John Douglas French Alzheimer Foundation
  3. Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression follows a specific spreading pattern, emphasizing the need to characterize those brain areas that degenerate first. The brainstem's locus coeruleus (LC) is the first area to develop neurofibrillary changes (neurofibrillary tangles [NFTs]). Methods: The methods include unbiased stereologiCal analyses in human brainstems to estimate LC volume and neuronal population in controls and individuals across all AD stages. Results: As the Braak stage increases by 1 unit, the LC volume decreases by 8.4%. Neuronal loss started only midway through AD progression. Age-related changes spare the LC. Discussion: The long gap between NFT accumulation and neuronal loss suggests that a second trigger may be necessary to induce neuronal death in AD. Imaging studies should determine whether LC volumetry can replicate the stage-wise atrophy observed here and how these changes are specific to AD. LC volumetry may develop into a screening biomarker for selecting high-yield candidates to undergo expensive and less accessible positron emission tomography scans and to monitor AD progression from presymptomatic stages. (C) 2016 the Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available