Journal
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 161-171Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-016-0543-x
Keywords
Average reference; Zero potential; Spherical head; Volume conductor model; Gold standard
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [81330032]
- 111 project [B12027]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Currently, average reference is one of the most widely adopted references in EEG and ERP studies. The theoretical assumption is the surface potential integral of a volume conductor being zero, thus the average of scalp potential recordings might be an approximation of the theoretically desired zero reference. However, such a zero integral assumption has been proved only for a spherical surface. In this short communication, three counter-examples are given to show that the potential integral over the surface of a dipole in a volume conductor may not be zero. It depends on the shape of the conductor and the orientation of the dipole. This fact on one side means that average reference is not a theoretical 'gold standard' reference, and on the other side reminds us that the practical accuracy of average reference is not only determined by the well-known electrode array density and its coverage but also intrinsically by the head shape. It means that reference selection still is a fundamental problem to be fixed in various EEG and ERP studies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available