4.0 Article

Hypervitaminemia B12 and malignant diseases: report of a cross-sectional study in an acute geriatric unit

Journal

ANNALES DE BIOLOGIE CLINIQUE
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages 193-203

Publisher

JOHN LIBBEY EUROTEXT LTD
DOI: 10.1684/abc.2017.1227

Keywords

hypervitaminemia B12; solid neoplasm; hemopathy; renal failure; prognostic marker

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypervitaminemia B12 has been associated or linked with a range of conditions, the majority of which are serious. Between March 26th, 2014 and June 30th, 2014, all patients aged >= 65 years, hospitalized in an acute geriatric unit in the university hospital center of Reims ( France) were included in an observational study. 190 patients were included. 48 patients presented a hypervitaminemia B12 (25.3%). The gender ratio (M/F) of the population with elevated vitamin B12 levels was 0.5. 41 patients were aged >= 75 years (85.4%). The mean vitamin B12 level was 1,085 pg/mL (+/- 428). 30 patients (62.5%) presented with moderate hypervitaminemia (<1,085 pg/mL), while 18 patients (37.5%) presented with elevated levels > 1,085 pg/mL. Using the Chi2 or Fisher tests and the Student test, the factors with a significant link to hypervitaminemia B12 in univariate analysis were: acute renal failure (p=0.0002); liver diseases (p<0.0001) and solid neoplasia (p=0.0030). Using binary logistic regression for multivariate analysis, variables independently related to hypervitaminemia B12 were: acute renal failure: (odds ratio [OR]= 6.3; 95% CI= 2.7-8.1; p <0.0001); liver diseases (OR= 5.4; 95% CI= 3.1-6.9; p <0.0001); hematological disorders (OR= 5.7; p=0.001); and age >= 75 years (OR= 3.7; 95% CI= 1.9-4.8; p=0.04). Moreover, there is an apparent correlation between rates of hypervitaminemia B12 and the number of etiologies identified (r=0.8; p=0.04). Our study confirm the significance of the link between hypervitaminemia B12 and hematological disorders in elderly patients, with a 5.7 fold higher risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available