4.5 Review

Pathway analysis of complex diseases for GWAS, extending to consider rare variants, multi-omics and interactions

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
Volume 1861, Issue 2, Pages 335-353

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.11.030

Keywords

Pathway analysis; Genome-wide association study (GWAS); Complex disease; Multi-omics; Interaction; Rare variants

Funding

  1. Research Grant Council of Hong Kong [PolyU 5637/12M]
  2. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [87TP, 87U7, G-YBK2]
  3. Endowed Professorship Scheme (KB Woo Family Endowed Professorship in Optometry) of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is a major method for studying the genetics of complex diseases. Finding all sequence variants to explain fully the aetiology of a disease is difficult because of their small effect sizes. To better explain disease mechanisms, pathway analysis is used to consolidate the effects of multiple variants, and hence increase the power of the study. While pathway analysis has previously been performed within GWAS only, it can now be extended to examining rare variants, other -omics and interaction data. Scope of review: 1. Factors to consider in the choice of software for GWAS pathway analysis. 2. Examples of how pathway analysis is used to analyse rare variants, other -omics and interaction data. Major conclusions: To choose appropriate software tools, factors for consideration include covariate compatibility, null hypothesis, one- or two-step analysis required, curation method of gene sets, size of pathways, and size of flanking regions to define gene boundaries. For rare variants, analysis performance depends on consistency between assumed and actual effect distribution of variants. Integration of other -omics data and interaction can better explain gene functions. General significance: Pathway analysis methods will be more readily used for integration of multiple sources of data, and enable more accurate prediction of phenotypes. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available