4.3 Article

Taste-Masking Effect of Chlorogenic Acid (CGA) on Bitter Drugs Evaluated by Taste Sensor and Surface Plasmon Resonance on the Basis of CGA-Drug Interactions

Journal

CHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 127-133

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/cpb.c16-00621

Keywords

chlorogenic acid; taste sensor; surface plasmon resonance; interaction; bitterness

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16K08426, JP16K18970]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K08426, 16K18970] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the taste-masking effects of chlorogenic acid (CGA) on bitter drugs using taste sensor measurements and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis of CGA drug interactions. Six different bitter drugs were used: amlodipine besylate (AMD), diphenhydramine hydrochloride (DPH), donepezil hydrochloride (DNP), rebamipide (RBM), diclofenac sodium (DCF) and etodolac (ETD). Taste sensor outputs were significantly inhibited by the addition of CGA to all drugs. The inhibition ratio of the taste sensor output decreased in the following order DPH>DNP>AMD approximate to DCF approximate to RBM approximate to ETD. The association rate constant (k(a)) for the interaction between drugs and CGA as evaluated by SPR measurement also decreased in the following order DPH>DNP>AMD>DCF approximate to ETD approximate to RBM. It was suggested that basic drugs (AMD, DNP, DPH) associate more easily with CGA than acidic drugs (DCF, RBM, ETD). The inhibition ratios (%) of the taste sensor output of bitter drugs caused by CGA and the association rate constants (k(a)) between the drugs and CGA were significantly correlated (r(s)=0.886, p<0.05, Spearman's correlation test). Our findings suggest that the taste-masking effects of CGA are due to its direct association with the drugs. CGA may therefore be a useful taste-masking agent for basic drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available