4.7 Article

Examining the relationship of organizational insiders' psychological capital with information security threat and coping appraisals

Journal

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 190-209

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.018

Keywords

Information security; Psychological capital (PsyCap); Protection motivation theory (PMT); Positive psychology; Organizational insiders

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Practitioners and researchers alike recognize the positive influence insiders' behavior can have on information systems (IS) security. This awareness has resulted in a research stream focused on the performance of protective behaviors. We contribute to this research stream by extending an oft-cited theory in the information security literature-protection motivation theory (PMT)-to include the relationship of insiders' psychological capital (PsyCap) with the mechanisms of PMT. PsyCap is a construct of role-breadth psychological capacities and resources embodying important work-related motivational resources. Therefore, given the varied facets central to PMT, determining the relationship of PsyCap with each distinct PMT mechanism is an important contribution. Furthermore, prior research has established that individuals can develop their PsyCap. Consequently, considering the relationship of role-breadth PsyCap with the PMT mechanisms provides an important and malleable, motivational antecedent that complements PMT and is absent from most assessments of the contemporary PMT model. We find support for PsyCap's relationship with the mechanisms of PMT and suggest opportunities to develop PsyCap in conjunction with other organizational security efforts. We present our findings, discuss their implications for research and practice, and highlight several opportunities for future research. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available