4.4 Article

Relating coccidioidomycosis (valley fever) incidence to soil moisture conditions

Journal

GEOHEALTH
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 51-63

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/2016GH000033

Keywords

coccidioidomycosis; valley fever; soil moisture; machine learning; modeling

Funding

  1. NASA Terrestrial Hydrology Program [NNH10ZDA001N-THP]
  2. USDA Agricultural Research Service [ARS 58-8042-5-077]
  3. NOAA through the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites-North Carolina [NA14NES432003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coccidioidomycosis (also called Valley fever) is caused by a soilborne fungus, Coccidioides spp., in arid regions of the southwestern United States. Though some who develop infections from this fungus remain asymptomatic, others develop respiratory disease as a consequence. Less commonly, severe illness and death can occur when the infection spreads to other regions of the body. Previous analyses have attempted to connect the incidence of coccidioidomycosis to broadly available climatic measurements, such as precipitation or temperature. However, with the limited availability of long-term, in situ soil moisture data sets, it has not been feasible to perform a direct analysis of the relationships between soil moisture levels and coccidioidomycosis incidence on a larger temporal and spatial scale. Utilizing in situ soil moisture gauges throughout the southwest from the U.S. Climate Reference Network and a model with which to extend those estimates, this work connects periods of higher and lower soil moisture in Arizona and California between 2002 and 2014 to the reported incidence of coccidioidomycosis. The results indicate that in both states, coccidioidomycosis incidence is related to soil moisture levels from previous summers and falls. Stated differently, a higher number of coccidioidomycosis cases are likely to be reported if previous bands of months have been atypically wet or dry, depending on the location.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available