4.7 Article

Effects of crop type and harvest on nest survival and productivity of dickcissels in semi-natural grasslands

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 240, Issue -, Pages 224-232

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.028

Keywords

Biofuels; Dickcissels; Grassland birds; Nest survival; Panicum virgatum; Productivity

Funding

  1. Federal Aviation Administration
  2. USDA-APHIS National Wildlife Research Center [1374390735CA]
  3. USDA NRCS
  4. USFWS Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program
  5. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station (MAFES)
  6. Forest and Wildlife Research Center
  7. College of Forest Resources at Mississippi State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent focus on climate change and global energy production has increased interest in developing biofuels including perennial native grasses (e.g. switchgrass [Panicum virgatum]) as viable energy commodities while simultaneously maintaining ecosystem function and biodiversity. However, there is limited research examining the effects of biofuel-focused grasslands on grassland bird reproductive success and conservation. In 2011-2013 we studied the effects of vegetation composition and harvest regimens of switchgrass monocultures and native warm-season grass (NWSG) mixtures on nest success, nest density, and productivity for dickcissels (Spiza americana) in Clay Co. MS, USA. There was no effect of vegetation metrics, harvest frequency, or biofuel treatment on nest survival. However, both vegetation composition and harvest frequencies influenced nest density and productivity. Native warm season grasses contained 54-64 times more nests relative to switchgrass treatments, and nest density and productivity were 10% greater in single harvest plots. Our results suggest semi-natural grasslands can balance biofuel production, ecosystem functionality, and conservation so that biofuels offer an opportunity for wildlife conservation rather than a continued threat to grassland birds. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available