4.6 Article

A comparison of two adaptive multivariate analysis methods (PLSR and ANN) for winter wheat yield forecasting using Landsat-8 OLI images

Journal

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 987-995

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2016.11.029

Keywords

Winter wheat; Yield forecast; Partial least squares regression; Artificial neural networks

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301378]
  2. Science and Technology Basic Research Program of China [2014FY210150]
  3. National Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFD0200600]
  4. Innovation Project of State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System of China [088RA901YA]
  5. Guangdong Province [2013B091500075]
  6. Chinese Academic of Science [2013B091500075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An assumption that the non-linear method is more reasonable than the linear method when canopy reflectance is used to establish the yield prediction model was proposed and tested in this study. For this purpose, partial least squares regression (PLSR) and artificial neural networks (ANN), represented linear and non-linear analysis method, were applied and compared for wheat yield prediction. Multi-period Landsat-8 OLT images were collected at two different wheat growth stages, and a field campaign was conducted to obtain grain yields at selected sampling sites in 2014. The field data were divided into a calibration database and a testing database. Using calibration data, a cross-validation concept was introduced for the PLSR and ANN model construction to prevent over-fitting. All models were tested using the test data. The ANN yield-prediction model produced R-2, RMSE and RMSE% values of 0.61, 979 kg ha(-1), and 10.38%, respectively, in the testing phase, performing better than the PLSR yield-prediction model, which produced R-2, RMSE, and RMSE% values of 0.39, 1211 kg ha(-1), and 12.84%, respectively. Non-linear method was suggested as a better method for yield prediction. (C) 2016 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available