4.6 Article

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with primary treatment failure: Ultra-high risk features and benchmarking for experimental therapies

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 2, Pages 161-170

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24615

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Sanofi
  2. Seattle Genetics
  3. Spectrum
  4. Teva
  5. Celegene
  6. Merck
  7. Millennium/Takeda
  8. Novartis
  9. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  10. Gilead
  11. Genentech
  12. Roche
  13. AbbVie
  14. Acerta
  15. ECOG
  16. Infinity
  17. Mayo Clinic
  18. Pharmacyclics
  19. TG therapeutics
  20. Takeda

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The outcomes of patients with DLBCL and primary treatment failure (PTF) in the rituximab era are unclear. We analyzed 331 patients with PTF, defined as primary progression while on upfront chemoimmunotherapy (PP), residual disease at the end of upfront therapy (RD) or relapse <6 months from end of therapy (early relapse; ER). Median age was 58 years and response to salvage was 41.7%. Two-year OS was 18.5% in PP, 30.6% in RD and 45.5% in ER. The presence of PP, intermediate-high/high NCCN-IPI at time of PTF or MYC translocation predicted 2-year OS of 13.6% constituting ultra-high risk (UHR) features. Among the 132 patients who underwent autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation, 2-year OS was 74.3%, 59.6% and 10.7% for patients with 0,1 and 2-3 UHR features respectively. Patients with PTF and UHR features should be prioritized for clinical trials with newer agents and innovative cellular therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available