4.4 Article

Toward precision smoking cessation treatment I: Moderator results from a factorial experiment

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages 59-65

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.025

Keywords

Smoking cessation; Treatment; Moderators; Factorial design; Psychiatric comorbidity

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [9P50CA143188, 1K05CA139871]
  2. Wisconsin Partnership Program
  3. NIH [P50DA10075, R01 DK097364, R01AA022931]
  4. National Research Service Award from the Health Resources and Services Administration [T32HP10010]
  5. Merit Review Award from the US Department of Veterans Affairs [101CX00056]
  6. NSF [DMS-1305725]
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1305725] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The development of tobacco use treatments that are effective for all smokers is critical to improving clinical and public health. The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) uses highly efficient factorial experiments to evaluate multiple intervention components for possible inclusion in an optimized tobacco use treatment. Factorial experiments permit analyses of the influence of patient characteristics on main and interaction effects of multiple, relatively discrete, intervention components. This study examined whether person-factor and smoking characteristics moderated the main or interactive effects of intervention components on 26-week self-reported abstinence rates. Methods: This fractional factorial experiment evaluated six smoking cessation intervention components among primary care patients (N = 637): Prequit Nicotine Patch vs. None, Prequit Nicotine Gum vs. None, Preparation Counseling vs. None, Intensive Cessation In-Person Counseling vs. Minimal, Intensive Cessation Telephone Counseling vs. Minimal, and 16 vs. 8 Weeks of Combination Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT; nicotine patch + nicotine gum). Results: Both psychiatric history and smoking heaviness moderated intervention component effects. In comparison with participants with no self-reported history of a psychiatric disorder, those with a positive history showed better response to 16- vs. 8-weeks of combination NRT, but a poorer response to counseling interventions. Also, in contrast to light smokers, heavier smokers showed a poorer response to counseling interventions. Conclusions: Heavy smokers and those with psychiatric histories demonstrated a differential response to intervention components. This research illustrates the use of factorial designs to examine the interactions between person characteristics and relatively discrete intervention components. Future research is needed to replicate these findings. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available