4.8 Article

Ultralight Graphene Foam/Conductive Polymer Composites for Exceptional Electromagnetic Interference Shielding

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages 9059-9069

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b01017

Keywords

noncovalent functionalization; graphene foam composites; ultralightweight; EMI shielding negative permittivity

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong SAR [16203415, 16229216]
  2. Postgraduate Scholarship of HKUST
  3. Hong Kong Ph.D. Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultralight, high-performance electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding graphene foam (GF)/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) composites are developed by drop coating of PEDOT:PSS on cellular-structured, freestanding GFs. To enhance the wettability and the interfacial bonds with PEDOT:PSS, GFs are functionalized with 4-dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid. The GF/PEDOT:PSS composites possess an ultralow density of 18.2 X 10(-3) g/cm(3) and a high porosity of 98.8%, as well as an enhanced electrical conductivity by almost 4 folds from 11.8 to 43.2 S/cm after the incorporation of the conductive PEDOT:PSS. Benefiting from the excellent electrical conductivity, ultralight porous structure, and effective charge delocalization, the composites deliver remarkable EMI shielding performance with a shielding effectiveness (SE) of 91.9 dB and a specific SE (SSE) of 3124 dB.cm(3)/g, both of which are the highest among those reported in the literature for carbon-based polymer composites. The excellent electrical conductivities of composites arising from both the GFs with three dimensionally interconnected conductive networks and the conductive polymer coating, as well as the left-handed composites with absolute permittivity and/or permeability larger than one give rise to significant microwave attenuation by absorption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available