4.8 Article

NO photooxidation with TiO2 photocatalysts modified with gold and platinum

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 205, Issue -, Pages 148-157

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.006

Keywords

Photocatalysis; NOx; TiO2; Au; Pt

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [IPT-2012-0927-420000]
  2. ERDF funds [UNLP10-3E-726]
  3. MINECO/FEDER, EU [CTQ2015-64664-C2-2-P]
  4. University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a comparative analysis is made of TiO2 modified with Pt or Au in NO photoxidation under different radiation and humidity conditions. The metals were deposited on the TiO2 surface using two methods, photodeposition and chemical reduction. All catalysts were supported on borosilicate 3.3 plates using a dip-coating technique. These modified photocatalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller measurements (BET), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectrum analysis (XPS). It was found from the XPS results that Pt and oxidized Pt species coexist on the samples obtained by photodeposition and chemical reduction. In the case of Au, though other oxidation states were also detected the dominant oxidation state for both catalysts is Au. TEM results showed most Au-C particles are below 5 nm, whereas for Au-P the nanoparticles are slightly bigger. With UV irradiation, the Pt modified catalysts do not show any significant improvement in NO photocatalytic oxidation in comparison with the unmodified P25. For Au, both modified photocatalysts (Au-P and Au-C) exceed the photocatalytic efficiency of the unmodified P25, with Au-C giving slightly better results. The incorporation of metals on the TiO2 increases its activity in the visible region. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available