4.5 Article

Annual Variability of Black Carbon Concentrations Originating from Biomass and Fossil Fuel Combustion for the Suburban Aerosol in Athens, Greece

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos8120234

Keywords

absorption; equivalent black carbon; fossil fuel combustion; wood burning; Aethalometer model; sensitivity analysis; biomass burning markers

Funding

  1. EnTeC FP7 Capacities programme (REGPOT-2012-2013-1, FP7) [316173]
  2. AIRUSE LIFE+ EU project [ENV/ES/584]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this work was to assess the yearly contribution of fossil fuel combustion (BCff) and wood burning (BCwb) to equivalent black carbon (eBC) concentrations, in Athens, Greece. Measurements were conducted at a suburban site from March 2013 to February 2014 and included absorption coefficients at seven wavelengths and PM2.5 chemical composition data for key biomass burning markers, i.e., levoglucosan, potassium (K) and elemental and organic carbon (EC, OC). A well-documented methodology of corrections for aethalometer attenuation coefficients was applied with a resulting annual dataset of derived absorption coefficients for the suburban Athens' atmospheric aerosol. The Aethalometer model was applied for the source apportionment of eBC. An optimum angstrom ngstrom exponent for fossil fuel ((ff)) was found, based on the combined use of the model with levoglucosan data. The measured eBC concentrations were equal to 2.4 +/- 1.0 g m(-3) and 1.6 +/- 0.6 g m(-3), during the cold and the warm period respectively. The contribution from wood burning was significantly higher during the cold period (21 +/- 11%, versus 6 +/- 7% in the warm period). BCff displayed a clear diurnal pattern with a morning peak between 8 and 10 a.m. (during morning rush hour) and a second peak during the evening and night hours, due to the shallowing of the mixing layer. Regression analysis between BCwb concentrations and biomass burning markers (levoglucosan, K and OC/EC ratio) supported the validity of the results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available