4.5 Article

Estimation of Optical Properties for HULIS Aerosols at Anmyeon Island, Korea

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos8070120

Keywords

humic-like substances (HULIS); optical properties; radiative forcing; hygroscopic growth factor; light absorption

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2015R1D1A1A09059906]
  2. Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program [CATER 2014-3190]
  3. Korea Meteorological Administration [CATER-2014-3190] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the sensitivity of the optical properties of carbonaceous aerosols, especially humic-like substances (HULIS), are investigated based on a one-year measurement of ambient fine atmospheric particulate matter (PM2.5) at a Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW) station in South Korea. The extinction, absorption coefficient, and radiative forcing (RF) are calculated from the analysis data of water soluble (WSOC) and insoluble (WISOC) organic aerosols, elemental carbon (EC), and HULIS. The sensitivity of the optical properties on the variations of refractive index, hygroscopicity, and light absorption properties of HULIS as well as the polydispersity of organic aerosols are studied. The results showed that the seasonal absorption coefficient of HULIS varied from 0.09 to 11.64 Mm(-1) and EC varied from 0.11 to 3.04 Mm(-1) if the geometric mean diameter varied from 0.1 to 1.0 mu m and the geometric standard deviation varied from 1.1 to 2.0, with the imaginary refractive index (IRI) of HULIS varying from 0.006 to 0.3. Subsequently, this study shows that the RF of HULIS was larger than other constituents, which suggested that HULIS contributed significantly to radiative forcing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available