4.8 Article

Addressing the Interface Issues in All-Solid-State Bulk-Type Lithium Ion Battery via an All-Composite Approach

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 9654-9661

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b16304

Keywords

lithium ion battery; bulk-type all-solid-state battery; solid-state electrolyte; composite; Li7La3Zr2O12; PEO

Funding

  1. NSF of China [51532002, 51572141, 51625202]
  2. Research fund of Science and Technology in Shenzhen [JSGG20150331155519130]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All-solid-state bulk-type lithium ion batteries (LIBs) are considered ultimate solutions to the safety issues associated with conventional LIBs using flammable liquid electrolyte. The development of bulk-type all-solid-state LIBs has been hindered by the low loading of active cathode materials, hence low specific surface capacity, and by the high interface resistance, which results in low rate and cyclic performance. In this contribution, we propose and demonstrate a synergistic all-composite approach to fabricating flexible all-solid-state LIBs. PEO-based composite cathode layers (filled with LiFePO4 particles) of similar to 300 mu m in thickness and composite electrolyte layers (filled with Al-LLZTO particles) are stacked layer by-layer with lithium foils as negative layer and hot-pressed into a monolithic all solid-state LIB. The flexible LIB delivers a high specific discharge capacity of 155 mAh/g, which corresponds to an ultrahigh surface capacity of 10.8 mAh/cm(2), exhibits excellent capacity retention up to at least 10 cycles and could work properly under harsh operating conditions such as bending or being sectioned into pieces. The all-composite approach is favorable for improving both mesoscopic and microscopic interfaces inside the all-solid-state LIB and may provide a new toolbox for design and fabrication of all-solid-state LIBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available