Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages 328-338Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.04.016
Keywords
CYPHER (TM) sirolimus-eluting stent; In vitro release testing; Reciprocating holder; Flow-through cell; Vessel-simulating flow-through cell
Categories
Funding
- European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
- economy and science of the state Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
- Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within REMEDIS
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this study drug release from the CYPHER (TM) stent, the gold standard in drug-eluting stent therapy until the end of its marketing in 2011/2012, was systematically evaluated using different in vitro release tests. The test systems included incubations setups, the reciprocating holder apparatus (USP 7), the flow-through cell apparatus (USP 4) and the vessel-simulating flow-through cell (vFTC) specifically designed for stent testing. The results obtained show a large variability regarding the fractions released into the media after 7 d ranging from 38.6% +/- 4.5% to 74.6% +/- 1.2%. The lowest fraction released was observed in the vFTC and the highest in an incubation setup with frequently changed media of a volume of 2 mL. Differences were even observed when using fairly similar and simple incubations setups with mere changes of the media volume, under maintenance of sink conditions, and of the vessel geometry. From these data it can be concluded, that in vitro release even from a slow releasing drug-eluting stent is greatly influenced by the experimental conditions and care must be taken when choosing a suitable setup. Comparison of the obtained in vitro release profiles to published in vivo data did not result in a distinct superiority of any of the tested methods regarding the predictability for the situation in vivo due to large differences in the reported in vivo data. However, this comparison yielded that the release observed in vitro using the 2 mL incubation setup and the reciprocating holder apparatus may be faster than the reported in vivo release. The results of this study also emphasize the necessity to use highly standardized release tests when comparisons between results from different experiments or even different labs are to be performed. In this context, the compendial methods are most likely offering the highest degree of standardization. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available