4.6 Article

Removal of cesium ion from contaminated water: Improvement of Douglas fir bark biosorption by a combination of nickel hexacyanoferrate impregnation and TEMPO oxidation

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 100, Issue -, Pages 186-193

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.12.012

Keywords

Cesium biosorption; Douglas fir bark; TEMPO oxidation; Nickel (II) hexacyanoferrate (III); Synergistic effect

Funding

  1. European Union
  2. Conseil Regional du Limousin
  3. Agence pour la Valorisation de la Recherche Universitaire en Limousin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New biosorbents derived from a forestry waste, Douglas fir bark, were developed to remove cesium ion (Cs+) from water. Crude bark was oxidised either by 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-l-oxy radical (TEMPO)-mediated oxidation or by the Fenton reaction to create carboxyl groups onto the bark's surface. Subsequently, nickel (II) hexacyanoferrate (III) (NiHCF) was incorporated into crude and oxidised barks. Crude bark has good intrinsic property for Cs+ sorption and TEMPO is the best tested oxidant able to improve this capacity. Structural analyses showed increase as well as important structural modification of bark surface following TEMPO oxidation. A link was established between the observed modifications and the amount of incorporated NiHCF. Combination of TEMPO oxidation and NiHCF impregnation increased Cs+ maximum sorption capacity (q(max)) of crude bark by a factor of 7 to reach 1.51 mmol g(-1). In addition, NiHCF/TEMPO bark could be used within pH range 4-10 with full sorption capacity. Finally, the release of nickel, iron and cyanide during incubation of NiHCF/TEMPO bark with water remained within the legal limits defined by U.S. EPA. Due to its high trapping capacity, pH stability and structural properties, NiHCF/TEMPO bark appears as a promising sorbent for removal of Cs+ from contaminated water. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available