4.7 Article

Cosmological parameters from pre-Planck CMB measurements: A 2017 update

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.063525

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [AST-0408698, AST-0965625]
  2. ACT Project [PHY-0855887, PHY-1214379]
  3. Princeton University
  4. University of Pennsylvania
  5. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  6. CFI under the auspices of Compute Canada
  7. Government of Ontario
  8. Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence
  9. University of Toronto
  10. David Dunlap family
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) Rutherford Fellowship
  12. ESRC [ES/N013956/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. STFC [ST/M004856/2, ST/M004856/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  15. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1312380, 1440226] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present cosmological constraints from the combination of the full mission nine-year WMAP release and small-scale temperature data from the pre-Planck Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and South Pole Telescope (SPT) generation of instruments. This is an update of the analysis presented in Calabrese et al. [Phys. Rev. D 87, 103012 (2013)], and highlights the impact on.CDM cosmology of a 0.06 eV massive neutrino-which was assumed in the Planck analysis but not in the ACT/SPT analyses-and a Planck-cleaned measurement of the optical depth to reionization. We show that cosmological constraints are now strong enough that small differences in assumptions about reionization and neutrino mass give systematic differences which are clearly detectable in the data. We recommend that these updated results be used when comparing cosmological constraints from WMAP, ACT and SPT with other surveys or with current and future full-mission Planck cosmology. Cosmological parameter chains are publicly available on the NASA's LAMBDA data archive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available