4.7 Article

Bioprospecting for native microalgae as an alternative source of sugars for the production of bioethanol

Journal

ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages 140-147

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2016.12.021

Keywords

Bioprospecting; Microalgae; Biofuels; Source of carbohydrates; Bioethanol

Funding

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT-2589]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While the production of biofuels holds potential to contribute to energy security, concerns on food prices, land use, and carbon emissions have arisen from increased production of first-generation bioethanol. While secondgeneration bioethanol from lignocellulosic agricultural waste faces difficult-to-overcome technological barriers, renewed promise is held in microalgae biomass as an alternative feedstock. In this work we show the results of bioprospecting for microalgae native of South America for accumulation of carbohydrates under conditions of nitrogen deficiency, and constant light and temperature. After a preliminary analysis of seventeen strains, we selected strain SP2-3, because its biomass could be enriched in carbohydrates over 70% (w/w) on a dry biomass basis, and Desmodesmus sp. strain FG for its fermentable sugars productivity. After optimization of microalgae culture conditions, biomass hydrolysis and fermentation with baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we demonstrated ethanol yields of up to 0.24 g ethanol.g of biomass(-1), and an ethanol concentration in the fermentation broth of 24 g ethanol.L of fermentation broth-1, for up to 87.4% of the maximum theoretical value. These results contribute to support the potential ofmicroalgae biomass as an alternative feedstock for bioethanol and the value of bioprospecting programs to identified candidate strains among natural biodiversity. (C) 2016 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available