4.7 Article

Removal of dissolved organic carbon and nutrients from urban wastewaters by Galdieria sulphuraria: Laboratory to field scale demonstration

Journal

ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS
Volume 24, Issue -, Pages 450-456

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2016.08.001

Keywords

Galdieria sulphuraria; Urban wastewater treatment; BOD removal; Nutrient removal; Field demonstration

Funding

  1. NSF Engineering Research Center for Reinventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt) [EEC 1028968]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-EE0006316]
  3. National Science Foundation Energize New Mexico (EPSCoR) [IIA-1301346]
  4. Office of the Vice President for Research at NMSU
  5. Ed & Harold Foreman Endowed Chair
  6. Las Cruces Utilities in accommodating the field demonstration project at the Las Cruces Wastewater Treatment Plant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous laboratory studies have demonstrated the ability of microalgae Galdieria sulphuraria (G. sulphuraria) in removing organic carbon and nutrients from filtered primary-settled urban wastewater via mixotrophic metabolism. An advantage of mixotrophic cultivation of G. sulphuraria over heterotrophic conditions is higher biomass yield that can potentially translate into higher energy recovery from the biomass. This study recorded a yield of 0.63 g biomass/g glucose under mixotrophic conditions while that under heterotrophic conditions was 0.42 g biomass/g glucose. These laboratory studies were extended to cultivate G. sulphuraria under field conditions in a 700 L photobioreactor (PBR) fed with primary-settled wastewater. Biomass growth and removal of dissolved organic carbon and nutrients in this PBR under batch mode were monitored over a range of influent and operating conditions. This field study confirmed that G. sulphuraria was able to grow well in primary-settled wastewater and reduce organic carbon (measured as BOD5), ammoniacal nitrogen, and phosphate levels to below the respective discharge standards; corresponding 3-day removal efficiencies ranged 46-72%; 63-89%; and 71-95%. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available