4.8 Article

Gas Separation Membranes Derived from High-Performance Immiscible Polymer Blends Compatibilized with Small Molecules

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 7, Issue 33, Pages 18618-18627

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b04747

Keywords

immiscible polymer blends; compatibilizers; small molecules; gas separations; membrane microstructure

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (CBET) [1403950, CHE-1126177]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1403950] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An immiscible polymer blend comprised of high-performance copolyimide 6FDA-DAM:DABA(3:2) (6FDD) and polybenzimidazole (PBI) was compatibilized using 2-methylimidazole (2-MI), a commercially available small molecule. Membranes were fabricated from blends of 6FDD:PBI (50:50) with and without 2-MI for H-2/CO2 separations. The membranes demonstrated a matrix-droplet type microstructure as evident with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging where 6FDD is the dispersed phase and PBI is the continuous phase. In addition, membranes with 2-MI demonstrated a uniform microstructure as observed by smaller and more uniformly dispersed 6FDD domains in contrast to 6FDD:PBI (50:50) blend membranes without 2-MI. This compatibilization effect of 2-MI was attributed to interfacial localization of 2-MI that lowers the interfacial energy similar to a surfactant. Upon the incorporation of 2-MI, the H-2/CO2 selectivity improved remarkably, compared to the pure blend, and surpassed the Robeson's upper bound. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of a small molecule to compatibilize a high-performance immiscible polymer blend. This approach could afford a novel class of membranes in which immiscible polymer blends can be compatibilized in an economical and convenient fashion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available