4.6 Article

Facile Preparation of Biocompatible Silk Fibroin/Cellulose Nanocomposite Films with High Mechanical Performance

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages 6227-6236

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01161

Keywords

Silk fibroin; Cellulose; Nanofibrils; Lithium bromide; Mechanical property; Biocompatibility

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [31600774]
  2. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [51325306]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2016CFB260]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although regenerated silk fibroin (SF), which has excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and a low inflammatory response in vivo, has promising applications in tissue engineering, the mechanical properties and biofunctionality must be further improved to satisfy tissue-engineering applications. Cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) are promising candidates for bionanocomposite production due to their ultrahigh strength and excellent biocompatibility. In this study, CNFs were extracted directly from microcrystalline cellulose using an aqueous lithium bromide solution, a typical solvent for dissolving SF fibers. As a result, SF/cellulose nanocomposite films with improved tensile strength were fabricated using aqueous lithium bromide solution as a novel solvent system for the dissolution and blending of SF and cellulose. The extracted CNFs were homogeneously dispersed within the composite films through the rapid gelation of cellulose. The degradability of the composite films in a protease XIV solution was strongly dependent upon the SF component, which significantly promoted the degradation rate of composite films. Adhesion and proliferation results showed that SF/cellulose nanocomposite films promoted cell viability. Our work suggests a facile and effective approach for designing SF/cellulose nanocomposites that may have wide potential applications in tissue engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available