4.7 Article

High-temperature alloy/honeycomb ceramic composite materials for solar thermal storage applications: Preparation and stability evaluation

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 4583-4593

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.12.119

Keywords

Alloy/ceramic composites; Solar thermal storage; SiCw/Al2O3 honeycomb ceramics; Thermal storage capacity; Stability evaluation; Failure mechanism

Funding

  1. 973 Program PR China. [2010CB227105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SiCw/Al2O3 honeycomb ceramics were engaged as sensible shell materials for encapsulating Al-Si alloys (latent heat materials) in the honeycomb holes to obtain alloy/ceramic composite materials with a high thermal storage capacity for high-temperature solar thermal storage applications. The stability evaluation between the sensible honeycomb ceramics and the latent alloys had been conducted and the failure mechanism for the latent alloys was investigated. Results indicated that the addition of the latent alloys could improve the thermal storage capacity of the sensible honeycomb ceramics significantly by >114% and the thermal storage densities of honeycombs containing Al-12Si and Al-20Si alloys were 1141.3 kJ/kg and 1106 kJ/kg (400-900 degrees C), respectively. The composite materials exhibited excellent physical and chemical stability. No cracks formed in the honeycomb ceramics and no leakage of alloys was discovered after the composite materials were exposed to 100 thermal cycles in a high-temperature testing environment. The oxidation of Al at > 600 degrees C would lower the latent heat of alloys and the thermal storage densities decreased to 1039.9 kJ/kg and 1013.2 kJ/kg after enduring 100 thermal cycles. This study not only provides a sensible-latent system of thermal storage materials with excellent stability but also gives an insight into the protection of metal containers against the corrosion from Al-based alloys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available